Summary
holding that where defendant failed to assert a claim in a prior proceeding arising out of the same transaction or event, he "impermissibly split a cause of action and [was] barred from asserting [it] as a counterclaim" in the current proceeding
Summary of this case from Weitz v. WagnerOpinion
Argued April 26, 1978
Decided June 8, 1978
Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, MARTIN B. STECHER, J.
Jill C. Lesser, Michael A. Lacher and Joseph Heller for appellants.
Colleen McMahon and Robert L. Laufer for respondents.
MEMORANDUM.
The order of the Appellate Division should be modified to the extent of providing that the third counterclaim be dismissed and, except as so modified, affirmed, with costs to appealing defendants. The question certified is answered in the negative.
In its third counterclaim, defendant seeks damages for counsel fees and other expenses incurred in connection with reobtaining possession of the demised premises, putting such premises in good order and preparing them for rerental. However, by failing to assert these claims in the prior summary proceeding based on nonpayment of rent, defendant has impermissibly split a cause of action and is barred from asserting them as a counterclaim in this action (930 Fifth Corp. v King, 42 N.Y.2d 886, 887-888; Century Factors v New Plan Realty Corp., 41 N.Y.2d 1040, 1041; Columbia Corrugated Container v Skyway Container Corp., 37 A.D.2d 845, affd 32 N.Y.2d 818).
Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur.
Order modified, with costs to appealing defendants, in accordance with the memorandum herein and, as so modified, affirmed. Question certified answered in the negative.