From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. Lemacks

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jan 17, 1995
452 S.E.2d 109 (Ga. 1995)

Opinion

S94A1866.

DECIDED JANUARY 17, 1995.

Habeas corpus. Clayton Superior Court. Before Judge Simmons.

Alphonso Ross, pro se. Foster Foster, Larry A. Foster, John A. Kimbell, for appellee.


Alphonso Ross was indicted on May 25, 1994. On June 6, 1994, Ross filed a pre-trial petition for a writ of habeas corpus, contending only that he had been denied a commitment hearing. The trial court denied the habeas petition and we affirm.

"The `purpose of a commitment hearing is simply to determine whether there is probable cause to believe the accused guilty of the crime charged, and if so, to bind him over for indictment by the grand jury.' State v. Middlebrooks, 236 Ga. 52, 54 ( 222 S.E.2d 343) (1976)." Spears v. Johnson, 256 Ga. 518 ( 350 S.E.2d 468) (1986). Thus, once an indictment has been returned against a defendant, the question of whether a commitment hearing should have been held becomes moot, id., and the trial court did not err in denying the writ in this case. See also Walker v. City of Atlanta, 238 Ga. 723 ( 235 S.E.2d 28) (1977).

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

DECIDED JANUARY 17, 1995.


Summaries of

Ross v. Lemacks

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jan 17, 1995
452 S.E.2d 109 (Ga. 1995)
Case details for

Ross v. Lemacks

Case Details

Full title:ROSS v. LEMACKS

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Jan 17, 1995

Citations

452 S.E.2d 109 (Ga. 1995)
452 S.E.2d 109

Citing Cases

Tidwell v. Paxton

(Citation omitted.) Ross v. Lemacks, 264 Ga. 839 ( 452 SE2d 109) (1995). Therefore, this appeal must be…

Boyd v. St. Lawrence

Dean v. State, 250 Ga. 77, 81 ( 295 SE2d 306) (1982) (purpose of OCGA § 17-4-62 is simply "to insure that the…