From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roshell v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
May 20, 2020
294 So. 3d 468 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 1D19-2304

05-20-2020

Duane Phineas ROSHELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Jasmine Russell, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and David Welch, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Jasmine Russell, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and David Welch, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellant pleaded no contest to witness tampering and battery. His sole argument in this appeal is that the trial court erred by failing to memorialize in writing its oral finding that Appellant was competent to proceed. The State concedes the court failed to enter a written order as required by Florida law. We accordingly affirm Appellant's judgment and sentence, but remand for entry of a written, nunc pro tunc order adjudicating him competent to proceed. See, e.g. , Mullens v. State , 197 So. 3d 16, 37 (Fla. 2016) (remanding for a written competency order despite a guilty plea); Dickey v. State , 224 So. 3d 862, 863 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (remanding for a written competency order while affirming judgment and sentence).

AFFIRMED ; REMANDED with directions.

Wolf and Winokur, JJ., and Colaw, James M., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Roshell v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
May 20, 2020
294 So. 3d 468 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Roshell v. State

Case Details

Full title:DUANE PHINEAS ROSHELL, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: May 20, 2020

Citations

294 So. 3d 468 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)