From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romero v. Romero

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct 19, 2022
351 So. 3d 81 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 3D21-2128

10-19-2022

Jorge L. ROMERO, Appellant, v. Daysi E. ROMERO, Appellee.

Carlos M. Rippes; Ilene F. Tuckfield, P.A., and Ilene F. Tuckfield, for appellant. Coral Way Law Center, and Miguel San Pedro, for appellee.


Carlos M. Rippes; Ilene F. Tuckfield, P.A., and Ilene F. Tuckfield, for appellant.

Coral Way Law Center, and Miguel San Pedro, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOGUE and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) ("Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence[.]"); People's Tr. Ins. Co. v. Fernandez, 317 So. 3d 207, 209 n.1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021) (noting that a trial court has "inherent authority to reconsider and, if deemed appropriate, alter or retract any of its nonfinal rulings prior to entry of the final judgment or order terminating an action ....").


Summaries of

Romero v. Romero

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct 19, 2022
351 So. 3d 81 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Romero v. Romero

Case Details

Full title:Jorge L. ROMERO, Appellant, v. Daysi E. ROMERO, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Oct 19, 2022

Citations

351 So. 3d 81 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)