Romero v. Romero

Full title: Jorge L. Romero, Appellant, v. Daysi E. Romero, Appellee.

Court: Florida Court of Appeals, Third District

Date published: Oct 19, 2022

No. 3D21-2128 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Oct. 19, 2022)

Opinion

3D21-2128

10-19-2022

Jorge L. Romero, Appellant, v. Daysi E. Romero, Appellee.

Carlos M. Rippes; Ilene F. Tuckfield, P.A., and Ilene F. Tuckfield, for appellant. Coral Way Law Center, and Miguel San Pedro, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lower Tribunal No. 17-16582 Ivonne Cuesta, Judge.

Carlos M. Rippes; Ilene F. Tuckfield, P.A., and Ilene F. Tuckfield, for appellant.

Coral Way Law Center, and Miguel San Pedro, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOGUE and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) ("Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence[.]"); People's Tr. Ins. Co. v. Fernandez, 317 So.3d 207, 209 n.1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021) (noting that a trial court has "inherent authority to reconsider and, if deemed appropriate, alter or retract any of its nonfinal rulings prior to entry of the final judgment or order terminating an action . . . .").