From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Sec'y

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
May 26, 2015
Case No. 4:14cv62-MW/GRJ (N.D. Fla. May. 26, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 4:14cv62-MW/GRJ

05-26-2015

MICHAEL A. ROGERS, Petitioner, v. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 19, and has also reviewed de novo Petitioner's objections to the report and recommendation, ECF No.20. Accordingly

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, over Petitioner's objections, as this Court's opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, "Respondent's Motion to Dismiss Petition for Habeas Corpus as Untimely, ECF No. 11, is GRANTED. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED as time-barred. A certificate of appealabily is DENIED." The Clerk shall close the file.

In so ruling, this Court notes that there are a couple of scrivener's errors. Of note, the report states that "[o]n May 12, 2008, the First DCA issued its mandate." The mandate actually issued on May 12, 2010, not May 12, 2008. ECF No. 11-2 at 155.

SO ORDERED on May 26, 2015.

s/ Mark E. Walker

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Rogers v. Sec'y

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
May 26, 2015
Case No. 4:14cv62-MW/GRJ (N.D. Fla. May. 26, 2015)
Case details for

Rogers v. Sec'y

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL A. ROGERS, Petitioner, v. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

Date published: May 26, 2015

Citations

Case No. 4:14cv62-MW/GRJ (N.D. Fla. May. 26, 2015)

Citing Cases

Wickboldt v. Jones

Alexander v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr., 523 F.3d 1291, 1297 (11th Cir. 2008) (holding that a Florida prisoner's…

Turner v. Sec'y Dep't of Corr.

Baker v. McNeil, 439 Fed Appx. 786, 789 (11th Cir. 2011)(Baker II). Additionally, as noted by Judge Collier…