From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roether v. Georgia

United States District Court, Southern District of Georgia
Feb 10, 2022
CV 220-092 (S.D. Ga. Feb. 10, 2022)

Opinion

CV 220-092

02-10-2022

HOLLIE ROETHER, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF GEORGIA, et al., Defendant.


ORDER

HON. LISA GODBEY WOOD, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Before the Court is Plaintiff Hollie Roether's Objection to the Court's Order deferring ruling on her Objection to the Court's Order denying as moot her Motion to Correct Filing Date. Dkt. No. 45; see also Dkt. Nos. 40, 43.

In its recent Order, this Court informed Plaintiff that if she wishes to correct the clerical error in the Motion to Reconsider's filing date, she must first seek leave to do so from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 10(e). Crumpacker v. Crumpacker, 516 F.Supp. 292, 297 (N.D. Ind. Apr. 23, 1981). Only if that petition is granted by the Court of Appeals will this Court have the authority to enter the desired correction. Id.

Now Plaintiff objects to that Order, arguing that this Court retains authority to correct clerical errors during an appeal. Dkt. No. 45 (citing Madura v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, 655 Fed.Appx. 717, 723 (11th Cir. 2016) (citing Showtime/The Movie Channel, Inc. v. Covered Bridge Condo. Ass'n, 895 F.2d 711, 713 (11th Cir. 1990))). While Plaintiff is correct that this Court retains authority to correct clerical errors during an appeal, Plaintiff misses an important caveat. A district court cannot unilaterally make corrections of this sort during the pendency of an appeal. As the Court stated in its previous Order, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a) expressly requires that leave to make the clerical correction be obtained from the court of appeals before the district court may act. Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(a) (“The court may correct a clerical mistake . whenever one is found in a judgment, order, or other part of the record. . . . But after an appeal has been docketed in the appellate court and while it is pending, such a mistake may be corrected only with the appellate court's leave.”).

Accordingly, Plaintiff's objection, dkt. no. 45, is OVERRULED.

SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Roether v. Georgia

United States District Court, Southern District of Georgia
Feb 10, 2022
CV 220-092 (S.D. Ga. Feb. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Roether v. Georgia

Case Details

Full title:HOLLIE ROETHER, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF GEORGIA, et al., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Georgia

Date published: Feb 10, 2022

Citations

CV 220-092 (S.D. Ga. Feb. 10, 2022)