From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
Jan 13, 1988
745 S.W.2d 353 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 0512-86.

January 13, 1988.

Appeal from 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County; Mike machado, judge.

David L. Willis, San Antonio, for appellant.

Sam D. Millsap, Jr., Dist. Atty. and Roland Garcia and Charles Estee, Asst. Dist. Attys., San Antonio, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

Before the court en banc.

OPINION ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW


Appeal is taken from a conviction for the offense of aggravated assault. After the jury found appellant guilty, the court found appellant had twice previously been convicted of felony offenses. Punishment was assessed at 75 years. Appellant's conviction was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. Rodriguez v. State, 706 S.W.2d 789 (Tex.App. — San Antonio 1986).

Just as in cases where we refuse to grant a petition for discretionary review, this Court's decision that such a petition was improvidently granted should not be construed as approval by this Court of the language or reasoning used by the Court of Appeals in reaching its decision, or even its holding on a given contention.

After careful review of the briefs of the respective parties, oral arguments, and the opinion of the Court of Appeals, we have determined that the appellant's petition for discretionary review was improvidently granted. It is, therefore, ordered dismissed.

CLINTON, MILLER and DUNCAN, JJ., dissent.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
Jan 13, 1988
745 S.W.2d 353 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. State

Case Details

Full title:Victor C. RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc

Date published: Jan 13, 1988

Citations

745 S.W.2d 353 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Zani v. State

As always, our refusal to treat the merits should not be construed as approval by this Court of the language…