From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 13, 2002
835 So. 2d 1172 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 2D01-5208.

Opinion filed December 13, 2002. Rehearing Denied February 3, 2003.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Mark I. Shames, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Richard E. Doran, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dale E. Tarpley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


A defendant cannot be sentenced to consecutive Prison Releasee Reoffender sentences for offenses arising from a single criminal episode. Smith v. State, 824 So.2d 263, 264 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). Valentine Rodriguez contends that his consecutive P.R.R. sentences are illegal for that reason. Rodriguez pleaded guilty to committing an aggravated assault and a felony battery against the same victim on the same day. However, we cannot discern from the record or the transcript of the plea colloquy whether the offenses were, in fact, committed in the same criminal episode. Therefore, we affirm Rodriguez's sentences without prejudice to any right he may have to raise this claim in a timely, facially sufficient rule 3.850 motion.

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 13, 2002
835 So. 2d 1172 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. State

Case Details

Full title:VALENTINE RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Dec 13, 2002

Citations

835 So. 2d 1172 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Young v. State

The Smith court cited Hale, supra, Smith v. State, 800 So.2d 703 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (citing Hale, among…

Gonzalez v. State

Having disposed of Count III in this manner, the final point we address is Gonzalez' argument that Count II…