From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 20, 1989
537 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-708.

January 20, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County, Wallace M. Jopling, J.

John Wesley Roberts, pro se.

No appearance, for appellee.


Appellant appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Several issues are raised in the motion, only one of which merits discussion. We reverse.

Appellant asserts that the State did not reveal to the appellant that another individual had confessed to the crime for which the appellant was convicted in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). The trial court ordered the state, as well as the public defender, to respond to appellant's motion, but the trial court did not hold an evidentiary hearing. Although these responses recite facts which, if true, demonstrate that appellant is entitled to no relief, they reflect the existence of factual issues which must be resolved either by attachment of portions of the record in appellant's case, or resolved by evidentiary hearing. Accordingly, the cause is reversed and remanded for attachment of appropriate records or other proceedings as prescribed in Rule 3.850.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ERVIN and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Roberts v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 20, 1989
537 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Roberts v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHN WESLEY ROBERTS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jan 20, 1989

Citations

537 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Gust v. State

Therefore, because the record, as we have divined it, does not conclusively refute the allegations contained…