From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robbins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 23, 1990
564 So. 2d 256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-2554.

July 23, 1990.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County; William H. Anderson, Judge.

John Anderson Robbins, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Bradley R. Bischoff, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellees.


Habeas corpus is not a vehicle for obtaining additional appeals on issues which were raised or should have been raised on appeal or could have been challenged pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850; White v. Duggar, 511 So.2d 554 (Fla. 1987). The issues raised by appellant were adequately addressed by this court in Robbins v. State, 370 So.2d 420 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). Defendant is procedurally barred from seeking further relief by failing to meet the time constraints enumerated in Rule 3.850, Fla.R.Crim.P.

Appellees request for certification is denied.

Affirmed.

WIGGINTON, BARFIELD and WOLF, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Robbins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 23, 1990
564 So. 2d 256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Robbins v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHN ANDERSON ROBBINS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA AND RICHARD DUGGER…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jul 23, 1990

Citations

564 So. 2d 256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Zuluaga v. State

The possibility that Appellant may have exhausted his remedies in the sentencing court — direct appeal,…

Wood v. State

By analogy, the case law precludes resort to a petition for writ of habeas corpus to pursue the time-barred…