From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Marotta

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 8, 2016
CASE NO.: SC16-218 (Fla. Mar. 8, 2016)

Opinion

CASE NO.: SC16-218

03-08-2016

R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY Petitioner(s) v. PHIL J. MAROTTA, ETC. Respondent(s)


Lower Tribunal No(s).: 4D13-1703; 062007CA036723AXXXCE

The Court accepts jurisdiction of this case.

Petitioner's initial brief on the merits shall be served on or before March 28, 2016; respondent's answer brief on the merits shall be served twenty days after service of petitioner's initial brief on the merits; and petitioner's reply brief on the merits shall be served twenty days after service of respondent's answer brief on the merits.

The Clerk of the Fourth District Court of Appeal shall file the record which shall be properly indexed and paginated on or before May 8, 2016. The Clerk may provide the record in the format as currently maintained at the district court, either paper or electronic. LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
POLSTON, J., dissents

Oral argument will be set by separate order. Counsel for the parties will be notified of the oral argument date approximately sixty days prior to oral argument. A True Copy
Test: /s/_________
John A. Tomasino
Clerk, Supreme Court kj
Served: ROBERT C. WEILL
ERIC L. LUNDT
GREGORY GEORGE KATSAS
RANDY ROSENBLUM
PHILIP FREIDIN
RICHARD BRIAN ROSENTHAL
ALEJANDRO ALVAREZ
HON. LONN WEISSBLUM, CLERK
ROBERT E. SCHACK
LORA R. DAMIANI


Summaries of

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Marotta

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 8, 2016
CASE NO.: SC16-218 (Fla. Mar. 8, 2016)
Case details for

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Marotta

Case Details

Full title:R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY Petitioner(s) v. PHIL J. MAROTTA, ETC…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Mar 8, 2016

Citations

CASE NO.: SC16-218 (Fla. Mar. 8, 2016)

Citing Cases

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Monroe

PER CURIAM.AFFIRMED. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Marotta , 182 So.3d 829 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016), rev. granted ,…

Philip Morris USA Inc. v. McKeever

As appellant acknowledges, there is binding case law rejecting appellant's arguments that due process…