From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rios v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 12, 2005
905 So. 2d 931 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 2D03-395.

June 3, 2005. Rehearing Denied July 12, 2005.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Daniel Lee Perry, Jr., Judge.

Heather M. Gray of Bodiford Associates, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard M. Franklin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


The State charged Nestor Rios and several codefendants with racketeering, conspiracy and drug trafficking offenses. Rios was tried with codefendant Miguel Cabrera. As we have explained in our opinion in Cabrera v. State, 890 So.2d 506, 508 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), the trial court committed fundamental error by including the conjunction and/or between Rios's and Cabrera's names in the jury instructions for the various crimes. For example, in a trafficking instruction, the judge stated that the jurors must find that "Miguel A. Cabrera and/or Nelson E. Rios knew that the substance was heroin. . . ." The State has conceded that the decision in Cabrera controls this appeal. Accordingly, we reverse Rios's convictions and remand for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.

CASANUEVA and LaROSE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rios v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 12, 2005
905 So. 2d 931 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Rios v. State

Case Details

Full title:Nestor RIOS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jul 12, 2005

Citations

905 So. 2d 931 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

Pineda v. State

However, the motion was successive, and there is no explanation as to why the grounds asserted in this motion…

Zeno v. State

This court has reached the same conclusion in subsequent decisions involving the same or similar jury…