From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Riglander v. Morning Journal Association

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 11, 1905
181 N.Y. 531 (N.Y. 1905)

Summary

Declaring unconstitutional a statute requiring court to set certain cases for trial on certain day, to the preference of other cases

Summary of this case from State ex rel. Emerald People's Utility District v. Joseph

Opinion

Argued February 21, 1905

Decided April 11, 1905

Benjamin F. Einstein and Joseph J. Cunningham for appellant.

David B. Hill and Clarence J. Shearn for respondents.


Orders affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative in each case; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN and WERNER, JJ.


Summaries of

Riglander v. Morning Journal Association

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 11, 1905
181 N.Y. 531 (N.Y. 1905)

Declaring unconstitutional a statute requiring court to set certain cases for trial on certain day, to the preference of other cases

Summary of this case from State ex rel. Emerald People's Utility District v. Joseph
Case details for

Riglander v. Morning Journal Association

Case Details

Full title:MABEL RIGLANDER, Appellant, v . MORNING JOURNAL ASSOCIATION et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 11, 1905

Citations

181 N.Y. 531 (N.Y. 1905)
73 N.E. 1131

Citing Cases

Ex Parte Foshee

Alabama West. R. Co. v. Tally-Bates Con. Co., 162 Ala. 396, 50 So. 341; 14 Am.Jur. §§ 150-158; State v. Roy,…

United States v. Howard

s order of business and to so conduct the same that the rights of all litigants may properly be safeguarded…