From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

RIGGI v. VILLAGE OF LE ROY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 11, 1950
276 App. Div. 944 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Opinion

January 11, 1950.

Present — Taylor, P.J., McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.


Judgment affirmed, with costs. (See Fedearowicz v. City of Amsterdam, 268 App. Div. 803, affd. 293 N.Y. 814.) All concur, except Taylor, P.J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for dismissal of the complaint on the ground that plaintiff failed to establish any negligence on the part of the defendant, and Kimball, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for granting a new trial on the ground that the verdict as rendered is against the law of the case as charged by the court. (Appeal from a judgment for plaintiff in two negligence actions, consolidated by court order.)


Summaries of

RIGGI v. VILLAGE OF LE ROY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 11, 1950
276 App. Div. 944 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)
Case details for

RIGGI v. VILLAGE OF LE ROY

Case Details

Full title:ROSE RIGGI, an Infant, by FELIX J. RIGGI, Her Guardian ad Litem…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 11, 1950

Citations

276 App. Div. 944 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Citing Cases

Dolan v. City of New York

" To these instructions by the court, the plaintiffs fully subscribed. The plaintiffs have placed great…