Summary
granting stay of lower court discovery during certiorari proceedings where "denial of a stay will cause irreparable harm in the form of disclosure of the very things which are the subject of the pending petition"
Summary of this case from Bank of Am. v. De MoralesOpinion
No. 5D13–1218.
2013-04-26
Rita RICE, Petitioner, v. Martin HAINES and Carol Haines, Respondents.
Petition for Certiorari Review of Order from the Circuit Court for Sumter County, William H. Hallman, III, Judge. Robert Gregory King of King Law Firm, Ocala, for Petitioner. T.R. Unice, Jr., Jeffrey D. Jensen and David M. Rosenbaum of Unice Salzman Radel, P.A., Palm Harbor, for Respondents.
Petition for Certiorari Review of Order from the Circuit Court for Sumter County, William H. Hallman, III, Judge.
Robert Gregory King of King Law Firm, Ocala, for Petitioner. T.R. Unice, Jr., Jeffrey D. Jensen and David M. Rosenbaum of Unice Salzman Radel, P.A., Palm Harbor, for Respondents.
ON MOTION FOR STAY
PER CURIAM.
The Petitioner has filed an Emergency Motion to Stay Issuance and Service of Subpoenas pending review in this case, arguing that a denial of a stay will cause irreparable harm in the form of disclosure of the very things which are the subject of the pending petition. The Respondents do not object and this court agrees.
STAY GRANTED, pending the disposition of Petition.