From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

R.F. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 11, 1989
549 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 89-0375.

October 11, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Lawrence L. Korda, J.

Alan W. Kaback, Coral Springs, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carol Cobourn, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We reverse that portion of the order on restitution awarding Marjorie Lois Geprich the sum of $15,000 to be paid by the appellant.

In the instant case, contrary to the requirements of section 39.11(1)(a)1, Florida Statute (1987), there was no determination by the court that the amount of restitution ordered by the court was an amount the child could reasonably be expected to pay. In effect, the trial court acknowledged several times at the restitution hearing that the $15,000 the court ordered as restitution would inevitably be uncollectible. Accordingly, we reverse that portion of the order on restitution awarding Marjorie Lois Geprich the sum of $15,000 to be paid by the appellant. In all other respects we affirm the order on restitution as it relates to appellant.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

DELL, GUNTHER and GARRETT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

R.F. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 11, 1989
549 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

R.F. v. State

Case Details

Full title:R.F., A CHILD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Oct 11, 1989

Citations

549 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

In Interest of J.S

PER CURIAM. Reversed and remanded on the authority of R.F. v. State, 549 So.2d 1169 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).…

In Interest of J.N

We reverse and remand because we agree with appellant that the trial court erred in ordering restitution…