From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reynolds v. Nat'l Default Servicing Corp.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jul 13, 2016
No. 70581 (Nev. Jul. 13, 2016)

Opinion

No. 70581

07-13-2016

KATHRYN REYNOLDS; AND NORMAN GARAND, Petitioners, v. NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING CORPORATION, AN ARIZONA CORPORATION AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN NEVADA; GREGORY WILDE, A NEVADA ATTORNEY; AND CINDY LEE STOCK, A NEVADA ATTORNEY, Respondents.


ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION

This original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition seeks, among other things, an order directing the United States District Court for the District of Nevada to grant petitioners' motion to remand.

Having considered the petition and the supporting documents, we are not persuaded that our intervention is appropriate, as this court lacks the authority to order the federal district court to take or refrain from taking the requested actions. See 28 U.S.C. § 1446(d) (2012); Laguna Vill. Inc. v. Laborers Int'l Union of N. Am., 672 P.2d 882, 885 (Cal. 1983) (recognizing that "the federal removal statute . . . expressly prohibit[s] any proceeding in state court after removal and prior to remand"); see also Mineral Cty. v. State, Dep't of Conservation & Nat. Res., 117 Nev. 235, 242-43, 20 P.3d 800, 805 (2001) (observing that a writ of mandamus is available only to compel the performance of an act by an "inferior" state tribunal, corporation, board, or person); Gojack v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 95 Nev. 443, 444, 596 P.2d 237, 238 (1979) (same with respect to a writ of prohibition); cf. Atlantic Coast Line R.R. Co. v. Bhd. of Locomotive Eng'rs, 398 U.S. 281, 286 (1970) ("[W]e have had in this country two essentially separate legal systems. Each system proceeds independently from the other . . . . [T]his dual system could not function if state and federal courts were free to fight each other for control of a particular case."). We therefore

ORDER the petition DENIED.

In light of our disposition of this writ petition, petitioners' July 1, 2016, motion is denied as moot. --------

/s/_________, J.

Cherry

/s/_________, J.

Douglas

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons cc: Kathryn Reynolds

Norman Garand

Thorndal Armstrong Delk Balkenbush & Eisinger/Reno

Tiffany & Bosco, P.A.


Summaries of

Reynolds v. Nat'l Default Servicing Corp.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jul 13, 2016
No. 70581 (Nev. Jul. 13, 2016)
Case details for

Reynolds v. Nat'l Default Servicing Corp.

Case Details

Full title:KATHRYN REYNOLDS; AND NORMAN GARAND, Petitioners, v. NATIONAL DEFAULT…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jul 13, 2016

Citations

No. 70581 (Nev. Jul. 13, 2016)