From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reliance Forwarding v. Nilson Van

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 3, 1980
387 So. 2d 513 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

No. 79-267.

September 3, 1980.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Orange County, Frederick T. Pfeiffer, J.

Richard R. Cook, Ormond Beach, for appellant.

No appearance, for appellee.


Based upon admissions that a stated account was unpaid, the trial court entered a final summary judgment for the plaintiff, Nilson Van Storage, against the defendant, Reliance Forwarding Co. In doing so, the trial court ignored the pending counterclaim of Reliance. This was error. The trial court should have entered a partial summary judgment for the plaintiff, appellee here, and then taken evidence on the counterclaim. Davar Corp. v. Tropic Land Improvement Corp., 330 So.2d 482 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Netterville v. Osborn, 139 So.2d 921 (Fla. 1st DCA 1962); Annot., 8 A.L.R.3d 1361 (1966). Alternatively, the trial court could have entered a final summary judgment on the complaint and stayed its execution pending resolution of the counterclaim. Zanathy v. Beach Harbor Club Ass'n., Inc., 343 So.2d 625 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

ORFINGER and FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Reliance Forwarding v. Nilson Van

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 3, 1980
387 So. 2d 513 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

Reliance Forwarding v. Nilson Van

Case Details

Full title:RELIANCE FORWARDING CO., A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. NILSON…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Sep 3, 1980

Citations

387 So. 2d 513 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Citing Cases

Moman v. Carr

However, we choose to treat the appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari and issue the writ for the…

Heritage Real Estate Dev. v. Gaich

Heritage and Blaeuer now contend that the counterclaim should have precluded entry of a summary judgment on…