From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reisman v. Theodore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 13, 1985
111 A.D.2d 227 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

May 13, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.).


Order affirmed, with costs.

Parties to an action have the absolute right to settle, in good faith, before or after judgment and, if the settlement is reached after judgment, an attorney's contingent fee is then based on the proceeds of the settlement ( see, Matter of Levy, 249 N.Y. 168). There is no evidence of bad faith on defendant's part. Since the record reveals that plaintiff has already received adequate compensation for the services rendered, the complaint was properly dismissed. O'Connor, J.P., Weinstein, Brown and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Reisman v. Theodore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 13, 1985
111 A.D.2d 227 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Reisman v. Theodore

Case Details

Full title:JEROME REISMAN, Appellant, v. IRIS THEODORE, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 13, 1985

Citations

111 A.D.2d 227 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Greene v. Schmukler (In re De Berry)

Moreover, Defendant, under New York law, has an attorney's statutory charging lien for his fees which…