From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 13, 2005
898 So. 2d 1204 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 3D05-448.

April 13, 2005.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Dennis J. Murphy, Judge.

Hoover Reed, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Ishir Mehta, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before CORTIÑAS and ROTHENBERG, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.


Hoover Reed appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence. The defendant-appellant was sentenced to thirty years in state prison as a habitual offender.

In this post-conviction motion, the defendant asserts that his sentence is impermissible under Blakely v. Washington, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). That decision is inapplicable to the defendant's case as we have previously held that the decision in Blakely is not retroactive. Burgal v. State, 888 So.2d 702 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); see McBride v. State, 884 So.2d 476, 478 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Reed v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 13, 2005
898 So. 2d 1204 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Reed v. State

Case Details

Full title:Hoover REED, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 13, 2005

Citations

898 So. 2d 1204 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

Morrison v. State

The decisions in Apprendi and Blakely are not retroactive. See Hughes v. State, 901 So.2d 837, 838 (Fla.…

Morrison v. State

The decisions in Apprendi and Blakely are not retroactive. See Hughes v. State, 901 So. 2d 837, 838 (Fla.…