From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Dzurenda

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jul 15, 2020
Case No. 2:19-cv-00326-JAD-BNW (D. Nev. Jul. 15, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2:19-cv-00326-JAD-BNW

07-15-2020

David Levoyd Reed, Plaintiff, v. James Dzurenda, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Before the Court is plaintiff David Levoyd Reed's motion for issuance of summonses. ECF No. 23. The Court will construe the motion as one to issue summonses and to effect service of process. Reed proceeds in form pauperis ("IFP") and he is therefore entitled to the Court's aid in issuing and serving all process. Accordingly, his motion will be granted.

I. Background.

Reed initiated this matter with an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and an accompanying complaint asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 1. Reed brought certain claims against defendants Paul Karsky and Julio Corral-Lagarda, and those claims survived screening by the district judge. ECF No. 13 at 19.

This Court granted IFP status to Reed and ordered that service be complete by February 2020. ECF No. 19. Nevada's Office of the Attorney General declined to accept service on behalf of Karsky and Corral-Lagarda. Instead, the Attorney General filed those defendants' last-known addresses under seal at ECF No. 21. Reed filed the underlying motion within the time that the Court allotted for service. ECF No. 23. ... ... ... ...

II. Discussion.

This Court construes Reed's motion as one to issue summonses for—and to effect service of process upon—Karsky and Corral-Lagarda. When a party proceeds in forma pauperis, the Court "shall issue and serve all process." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d); Puett v. Blandford, 912 F.2d 270, 273 (9th Cir. 1990) ("a party proceeding in forma pauperis is entitled to have the summons and complaint served by the U.S. Marshal.").

Pro se filings must "be liberally construed." Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007).

Section 1915(d) dovetails with Rule 4, which provides that upon the request of a plaintiff authorized to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court "must" order "that service be made by a United States marshal or deputy or by a person specifically appointed by the court." FED. R. CIV. P. 4(c)(3).

Here, Reed proceeds IFP and he has viable claims against Karsky and Corral-Lagarda. Accordingly, Reed is entitled to the Court's aid in issuing and serving all process and the Court will therefore grant his motion. Further, because Reed timely filed his motion for service, and because the failure to effect service within the time allotted was not his fault, the Court finds good cause to extend the time for service upon Karsky and Corral-Lagarda for an additional sixty days from this Court's order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m); Spinks v. Placer Cnty., No. 2:15-cv-00671-JMA-KJN, 2018 WL 1316981, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2018) (citing Mann v. Am. Airlines, 324 F.3d 1088, 1090 (9th Cir. 2003)).

III. Conclusion.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Reed's motion for issuance of summonses (ECF No. 23) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time for service upon defendants Karsky and Corral-Lagarda is extended an additional sixty days from today's order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court send Reed three blank copies of form USM-285.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Reed shall have twenty days in which to furnish the U.S. Marshals Service with the required USM-285 forms. On the forms, Reed must leave blank the defendants' last-known addresses. The U.S. Marshals Service will acquire these addresses from the Attorney General's sealed filing at ECF No. 21.

The U.S. Marshals Service is located at 333 South Las Vegas Boulevard, Suite 2058, Las Vegas, Nevada 89101.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court issue summonses, under seal, to defendants Paul Karsky and Julio Corral-Lagarda, using the addresses under seal at ECF No. 21.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court serve a copy of this order, the sealed and issued summonses, and the operative complaint (ECF No. 14) on the U.S. Marshals Service.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon receipt of the USM-285 forms from plaintiff, the U.S. Marshal shall, in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(3), attempt service on defendants Paul Karsky and Julio Corral-Lagarda at their last known addresses, filed under seal at ECF No. 21.

DATED: July 15, 2020

/s/_________

BRENDA WEKSLER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Reed v. Dzurenda

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jul 15, 2020
Case No. 2:19-cv-00326-JAD-BNW (D. Nev. Jul. 15, 2020)
Case details for

Reed v. Dzurenda

Case Details

Full title:David Levoyd Reed, Plaintiff, v. James Dzurenda, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jul 15, 2020

Citations

Case No. 2:19-cv-00326-JAD-BNW (D. Nev. Jul. 15, 2020)