From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ratner v. California

U.S.
Jun 12, 1967
388 U.S. 442 (1967)

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO.

No. 10.

Decided June 12, 1967.

Certiorari granted; reversed.

Richard A. Lavine for petitioners.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Robert R. Granucci and Charles W. Rumph, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent.


The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo, is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN would affirm.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496, and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455, and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm.


Summaries of

Ratner v. California

U.S.
Jun 12, 1967
388 U.S. 442 (1967)
Case details for

Ratner v. California

Case Details

Full title:RATNER ET AL. v . CALIFORNIA

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 12, 1967

Citations

388 U.S. 442 (1967)
87 S. Ct. 2092

Citing Cases

United States v. New Orleans Book Mart, Inc.

The swinging single may be all right, but doubles still don't go. See Hunt v. Keriakos, 1 Cir. 1970, 428 F.2d…

United States v. Groner

9 U.S. 573, 88 S.Ct. 690, 19 L.Ed.2d 776 (1968); Chance v. California, 389 U.S. 89, 88 S.Ct. 253, 19 L.Ed. 2d…