From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rasheed v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 10, 1984
449 So. 2d 981 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. AX-177.

May 10, 1984.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Duval County, Donald R. Moran, Jr., J.

Faheem Saleem Rasheed, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.


Appellant seeks to raise an issue by motion for post conviction relief, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, which could properly have been litigated during the trial proceedings and reviewed upon direct appeal. Appellant's direct appeal was exhausted by this Court's affirmance of his conviction and sentence for burglary and grand theft in Rasheed v. State, 433 So.2d 522 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

We affirm the trial court's denial of relief as appellant's single issue involved whether the circumstantial evidence presented at his trial was sufficient to support a finding of guilt, an issue not cognizable through collateral attack, see Demps v. State, 416 So.2d 808, 809 (Fla. 1982); Meeks v. State, 382 So.2d 673, 675 (Fla. 1980), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1155, 103 S.Ct. 799, 74 L.Ed.2d 1002 (1983).

ERVIN, C.J., and THOMPSON and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rasheed v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 10, 1984
449 So. 2d 981 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Rasheed v. State

Case Details

Full title:FAHEEM SALEEM RASHEED, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: May 10, 1984

Citations

449 So. 2d 981 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Hoewischer v. State

Sufficiency of the evidence is not an issue cognizable through collateral attack. Rasheed v. State, 449 So.2d…

Green v. State

Affirmed. See Rasheed v. State, 449 So.2d 981 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).…