From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Randolph v. Crane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 27, 2000
278 A.D.2d 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

December 27, 2000.

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Notaro, J. — Summary Judgment.

PRESENT: PINE, J.P., HAYES, WISNER AND LAWTON, JJ.


Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following

Memorandum:

Supreme Court erred in denying the motion of Suzanne M. Crane (defendant) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims against her. Defendant established her entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, and neither plaintiffs nor the remaining defendants raised a triable issue of fact whether she was negligent in the operation of her vehicle ( see, Betts v. Marecki, 247 A.D.2d 916). We therefore modify the order by granting the motion of defendant and dismissing the complaint and cross claims against her.


Summaries of

Randolph v. Crane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 27, 2000
278 A.D.2d 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Randolph v. Crane

Case Details

Full title:LINDA L. RANDOLPH AND THOMAS E. RANDOLPH, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 27, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
718 N.Y.S.2d 910

Citing Cases

Zielinski v. Van Pelt

te the trial inasmuch as "[p]laintiff established that the liability issue presented herein is uncomplicated…

Wheatland Grain Lumber Co. et al. v. Dowden

The case of Shell v. Martin, 19 Ark. 139, which holds to the contrary of this, was disapproved by Mr. Justice…