From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramos v. Wolf

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 10, 2023
59 F.4th 1010 (9th Cir. 2023)

Opinion

No. 18-16981

02-10-2023

Crista RAMOS; Cristina Morales; Benjamin Zepeda; Orlando Zepeda; Juan Eduardo Ayala Flores; Elsy Yolanda Flores De Ayala; Maria Jose Ayala Flores; Hnaida Cenemat; Wilna Destin; Rilya Salary; Sherika Blanc; Imara Ampie; Mazin Ahmed; Hiwaida Elarabi, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Chad F. WOLF, Secretary of Homeland Security; Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security; U.S. Department of Homeland Security; United States of America, Defendants-Appellants.


D.C. No. 3:18-cv-01554-EMC, Northern District of California, San Francisco

ORDER

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Judges Owens and H.A. Thomas did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.


Summaries of

Ramos v. Wolf

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 10, 2023
59 F.4th 1010 (9th Cir. 2023)
Case details for

Ramos v. Wolf

Case Details

Full title:CRISTA RAMOS; CRISTINA MORALES; BENJAMIN ZEPEDA; ORLANDO ZEPEDA; JUAN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 10, 2023

Citations

59 F.4th 1010 (9th Cir. 2023)

Citing Cases

United States v. Carrillo-Lopez

975 F.3d 872, 895-96 (9th Cir. 2020). But that decision has been vacated and scheduled for rehearing en banc,…