From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramos v. Jackson

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 18, 1987
510 So. 2d 1241 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Summary

holding that similar provision did not amount to a denial of access to the courts under state constitution

Summary of this case from Gonya v. Comm'r, N.H. Dep't

Opinion

No. 86-2951.

August 18, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Richard S. Hickey, J.

Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder Carson and Luis S. Konski, West Palm Beach, for appellants.

Beasley, Olle Downs and Pamela A. Chamberlin, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and BASKIN, JJ.


The trial court held that pursuant to Section 631.011(10), Florida Statutes (1985), Ch. 631, Florida Statutes (1985), the "Insurers Rehabilitation and Liquidation Act" governs foreign insolvent insurers with insureds in this state, and that once an election to seek relief under section 631.193, Florida Statutes (1985) is made the insured is released, and furthermore that such election may not be withdrawn. We find no error and affirm. See and compare Ervin v. Capital Weekly Post, Inc., 97 So.2d 464 (Fla. 1957); Richard Bertram Co. v. Green, 132 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961); Matthews v. G.S.P. Corporation, 354 So.2d 1243 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). We do not find that such a provision amounts to a denial to access to the courts pursuant to Article I, Section 21 of the Florida Constitution (1968) as the injured party has a right to either seek relief against alleged tortfeasors or waive same and seek relief from the receiver of the insolvent insurer. Compare Acton v. Fort Lauderdale Hospital, 440 So.2d 1282 (Fla. 1983); Lasky v. State Farm Insurance Company, 296 So.2d 9 (Fla. 1974); Mahoney v. Sears, Roebuck Company, 419 So.2d 754 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Therefore, the final summary judgment under review be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Section 631.011 Florida Statutes (1985)
(10) "Insurer," in addition to persons to defined under s. 624.03, also includes persons purporting to be insurers or organizing, or holding themselves out as organizing, in this state for the purpose of becoming insurers and all insurers who have insureds resident in this state. (Emphasis added.)

631.193 Releases
The filing of a claim constitutes a release of the insured from liability to the claimant to the extent of the coverage or policy limits provided by the insolvent insurer. The release is conditioned upon the cooperation on the insured with the receiver and the Florida Insurance Guaranty Association and any other guaranty association in defense of the claim. This release does not operate to discharge the Florida Insurance Guaranty Association or any other guaranty association from any of its responsibilities and duties set out in this chapter.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Ramos v. Jackson

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 18, 1987
510 So. 2d 1241 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

holding that similar provision did not amount to a denial of access to the courts under state constitution

Summary of this case from Gonya v. Comm'r, N.H. Dep't

holding that similar statute did not amount to a denial of Florida constitutional right of access to the courts because "the injured party has a right to either seek relief against alleged tortfeasors or waive same and seek relief from the receiver of the insolvent insurer"

Summary of this case from Gonya v. Comm'r, N.H. Dep't
Case details for

Ramos v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:MARTHA C. RAMOS AND RUBEN RAMOS, APPELLANTS, v. JULIUS JACKSON, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Aug 18, 1987

Citations

510 So. 2d 1241 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Koken v. Reliance Ins. Co.

In explicating the statute, both the Liquidator and Mawson also argued for application of two Florida…

Gonya v. Comm'r, N.H. Dep't

He argues that the third party claimant is still exercising his right to the redress of his injuries because…