From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rahming v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 6, 1992
592 So. 2d 678 (Fla. 1992)

Opinion

No. 78164.

February 6, 1992.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Direct Conflict of Decisions, Fourth District — Case No. 90-1704 (St. Lucie County).

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender and Ellen Morris, Asst. Public Defender, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Douglas J. Glaid, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.


We review Rahming v. State, 579 So.2d 925 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), because it relied on Carter v. State, 571 So.2d 520 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), quashed, 586 So.2d 340 (Fla. 1991). The question presented in the instant case is whether Florida's uniform sentencing guidelines allow legal constraint points to be assessed for each offense committed while under legal constraint. In Flowers v. State, 586 So.2d 1058 (Fla. 1991), we answered this same question in the negative. Accordingly, we quash Rahming and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in Flowers.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J. and OVERTON, BARKETT, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rahming v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 6, 1992
592 So. 2d 678 (Fla. 1992)
Case details for

Rahming v. State

Case Details

Full title:LEVI RAHMING, PETITIONER, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Feb 6, 1992

Citations

592 So. 2d 678 (Fla. 1992)

Citing Cases

Lifred v. State

In his first appeal, codefendant Rahming's conviction and sentence were affirmed by this court, see Rahming…