From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rahming v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 5, 1993
616 So. 2d 1232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-2204.

May 5, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Lucie County; Marc A. Cianca, Judge.

David M. Lamos, Fort Pierce, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Douglas J. Glaid, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We affirm appellant's sentences, except we reverse the imposition of the consecutive mandatory minimum sentences and remand for resentencing in accordance with this opinion. Because appellant's offenses occurred during a single, continuous criminal episode, consecutive mandatory minimum sentences were improper. Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1983); Cox v. State, 605 So.2d 978 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., GUNTHER, J., and WALDEN, JAMES H., Senior Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Rahming v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 5, 1993
616 So. 2d 1232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Rahming v. State

Case Details

Full title:LEVI RAHMING, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 5, 1993

Citations

616 So. 2d 1232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Lifred v. State

Lifhred v. State, 598 So.2d 335 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Defendant Lifred (also spelled Lifhred) asks us to…