Opinion
No. 4D21-689
11-24-2021
William P. RAGUSA, Appellant, v. Victoria M. RAGUSA, Appellee.
William P. Ragusa, Boynton Beach, pro se. No appearance for appellee.
William P. Ragusa, Boynton Beach, pro se.
No appearance for appellee.
Per Curiam. Affirmed . See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (holding that "[w]ithout a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory," and "[w]ithout knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal"); Esaw v. Esaw , 965 So. 2d 1261, 1264 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ("The most salient impediment to meaningful review of the trial court's decision is not the absence of findings, but the absence of a transcript.").
Gross, Forst and Kuntz, JJ., concur.