From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rackley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec 1, 2016
207 So. 3d 365 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 1D16–2544.

12-01-2016

Alex RACKLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Alex Rackley, pro se, Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Alex Rackley, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Although we find Appellant's motion under Rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure was timely filed, we reject Appellant's claims on the merits and affirm. See Robertson v. State, 829 So.2d 901, 906 (Fla.2002) (noting that appellate court may affirm a trial court order that reaches the right result but for the wrong reason).

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rackley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec 1, 2016
207 So. 3d 365 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Rackley v. State

Case Details

Full title:Alex RACKLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Dec 1, 2016

Citations

207 So. 3d 365 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)