From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Qulling v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Oct 27, 2006
940 So. 2d 548 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 5D06-3000.

October 27, 2006.

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County, Richard Tombrink, Jr., Judge.

Gary C. Quilling, Monticello, Pro Se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


We affirm the denial of Gary Quilling's motion to correct sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Mr. Quilling misconstrues the mandatory minimum sentencing laws applicable to him. Those laws set forth the minimum, but not the maximum sentences that must be imposed for the designated offenses. The general sentencing statutes establish the maximum penalties. We agree with Mr. Quilling that the trial court misperceived his motion as one filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Mr. Quilling's motion, while lacking merit, was properly filed under rule 3.800 and should not be deemed to be a rule 3.850 motion.

AFFIRMED.

PLEUS, C.J., ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Qulling v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Oct 27, 2006
940 So. 2d 548 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Qulling v. State

Case Details

Full title:Gary C. QUILLING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Oct 27, 2006

Citations

940 So. 2d 548 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Quilling v. State

The trial court denied the motion, and this court affirmed. See Quilling v. State, 940 So.2d 548 (Fla. 5th…

Quilling v. Sec'y

On October 27, 2006, the state appellate court affirmed with written opinion. Quilling v. State, 940 So. 2d…