From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quackenbush v. Town of Palm Beach

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 5, 1963
151 So. 2d 348 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

Opinion

No. 3437.

March 6, 1963. Rehearing Denied April 5, 1963.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, James R. Knott, J.

Gibson, Gibson Reese, Thomas L. Bailey and Thomas E. Sholts, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Elwyn L. Middleton of Burns, Middleton, Rogers Farrell, Palm Beach, for appellee.


The review sought by appellant relates to an order in effect denying his petition for rehearing and not to the final decree of dismissal. Such a review cannot be had, because if this court is to determine the correctness of the ruling on the petition, it is necessary that the final decree and the record upon which it is based be considered also. Since this requires consideration of a decree not here made the subject of attack, there accordingly arises no jurisdictional foundation upon which this court could afford to appellant the requested review. The appeal must therefore be dismissed. See Klemenko v. Klemenko, Fla. 1957, 97 So.2d 11; Finley v. Finley, Fla. 1958, 103 So.2d 191; McNary v. Hudson, Fla.App. 1959, 110 So.2d 73; Oxford v. Polk Federal Savings Loan Association of Lakeland, Fla.App. 1962, 147 So.2d 603.

Appeal dismissed.

SHANNON, C.J., and KANNER, J., and WIGGINTON, JOHN, Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Quackenbush v. Town of Palm Beach

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 5, 1963
151 So. 2d 348 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)
Case details for

Quackenbush v. Town of Palm Beach

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN VP. QUACKENBUSH, APPELLANT, v. TOWN OF PALM BEACH, A MUNICIPAL…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 5, 1963

Citations

151 So. 2d 348 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

Citing Cases

Colburn v. Highland Realty Co.

The motions are based upon the proposition that the appeal is taken from an interlocutory order entered…

Bennett v. Zager

The appellee did not respond to the point raised in appellant's brief. The appeal is subject to dismissal…