From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pub. Util. Dist. No. 1 v. F.E.R.C

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 3, 2008
547 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

Nos. 03-72511, 03-74208, 03-74617, 03-74757, 04-70712.

November 3, 2008.

FERC Nos. EL02-26 et al., EL02-26-000, EL-02-28, EL02-28-004, Northern District of California, San Francisco.

FERC No. EL02-26, et al., District of Oregon, Portland.

Before: JAMES R. BROWNING, HARRY PREGERSON, and MARSHA S. BERZON, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

In light of the Supreme Court's ruling in Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. v. Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. 2733, 171 L.Ed.2d 607 (2008), we VACATE our prior opinion and REMAND to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

VACATED and REMANDED.


Summaries of

Pub. Util. Dist. No. 1 v. F.E.R.C

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 3, 2008
547 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Pub. Util. Dist. No. 1 v. F.E.R.C

Case Details

Full title:PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY WASHINGTON, Petitioner…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 3, 2008

Citations

547 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC v. Shumlin

State regulatory agencies would focus on the “retail rates charged directly to the public.” Pub. Util. Dist.…