From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Proctor v. Commercial Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 31, 1979
373 So. 2d 943 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion

No. 79-509.

July 25, 1979. Rehearing Denied August 31, 1979.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Okeechobee County, G.E. Bryant, Jr., J.

Charles R. Forman of Musleh, Bond, Arnett, Forman Atkins, Ocala, for appellants.

Jeffrey C. Fulford of Adams Hill, Orlando, for appellee.


This is an appeal from an interlocutory order denying motion for change of venue. It is a proper appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(A).

Section 47.011, Florida Statutes (1977) is the statute governing venue; that is, in which county one properly files a lawsuit. In this action the plaintiff (appellee) has its principal place of business, thus resides, in Okeechobee County. The defendant Proctor is a resident of Marion County and the appellant INA is in the suit as a surety for Proctor on a bond issued in Marion County.

Section 47.011, Florida Statutes (1977):
Where actions may be begun. Actions shall be brought only in the county where the defendant resides, where the cause of action accrued, or where the property in litigation is located. This section shall not apply to actions against nonresidents.

This is a lawsuit alleging a tort so there is no property involved. The suit is generally about an alleged wrongful injunction obtained by appellant against the Sheriff of Marion County preventing an execution sale which sale was to be held in order to satisfy a debt owed the appellee by a third party. Because the debt was reduced to judgment in Okeechobee County and post judgment orders were entered in that county the appellee maintains the venue properly lies in that county and appellee maintains that position even though the alleged wrong he complains of occurred in Marion County. We cannot agree with appellee and must reverse the order and remand to the trial court to require transfer of this cause to Marion County, in the Fifth Judicial Circuit for any further proceedings. Gaboury v. Flagler Hospital, Inc., 316 So.2d 642 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Coggin Pontiac, Inc. v. Putnam Auto Sales, Inc., 278 So.2d 647 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ANSTEAD and BERANEK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Proctor v. Commercial Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 31, 1979
373 So. 2d 943 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

Proctor v. Commercial Bank

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH E. PROCTOR AND INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, APPELLANTS, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Aug 31, 1979

Citations

373 So. 2d 943 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Citing Cases

Straske v. McGillicuddy

A cause of action for tort arises at the place where the act creating the right to bring the action occurred.…

Provident Mgmt., v. City of Treasure Island

The City points out that only one case aside from the present case has classified a wrongful injunction as a…