From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Principals Capital Resources v. Splish Splash

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 29, 1998
251 A.D.2d 640 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Summary

directing offending party and counsel to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely inform the court that the case was settled

Summary of this case from Merkle v. Guardianship of Jacoby

Opinion

June 29, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Driscoll, J.).


Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the cross appeal is dismissed as abandoned, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the plaintiff Howard R. Katz and the attorneys representing the defendants are directed to show cause why an order should not be made and entered imposing such sanctions and/or costs, if any, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.2 (g), as this Court may deem appropriate for their failure to timely inform the Court that the case was settled, by filing an original and four copies of their respective affirmations or affidavits on that issue in the office of the clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other or before July 20, 1998; and it is further,

Ordered that the clerk of this Court is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order upon the plaintiffs and the attorneys representing the defendants by mail.

Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Principals Capital Resources v. Splish Splash

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 29, 1998
251 A.D.2d 640 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

directing offending party and counsel to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely inform the court that the case was settled

Summary of this case from Merkle v. Guardianship of Jacoby
Case details for

Principals Capital Resources v. Splish Splash

Case Details

Full title:PRINCIPALS CAPITAL RESOURCES CORPORATION et al., Respondents-Appellants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 29, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 640 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
676 N.Y.S.2d 477

Citing Cases

Merkle v. Guardianship of Jacoby

However, other appellate courts have viewed such a dereliction as a serious breach of counsel's duty…