From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prescod v. Brown

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Feb 10, 2011
10 Civ. 2395 (SHS) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 10, 2011)

Opinion

10 Civ. 2395 (SHS).

February 10, 2011


ORDER


In a Report and Recommendation dated January 20, 2011, Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Peck recommended that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus be denied as time barred by the AEDPA's one year limitations period. Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due by February 7, 2011. To date, the Court has received no objections from petitioner. After a de novo review of the January 20, 2011 Report and Recommendation,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Magistrate Judge Peck's "Report and Recommendation" is adopted;

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied, and the petition is dismissed;

3. As petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. 28 U.S.C. § 2253; see also Richardson v. Greene, 497 F.3d 212, 217 (2d Cir. 2007); and

5. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) the Court certifies that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.

Dated: New York, New York

February 10, 2011

SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

Prescod v. Brown

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Feb 10, 2011
10 Civ. 2395 (SHS) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 10, 2011)
Case details for

Prescod v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD PRESCOD, Petitioner, v. D. BROWN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Feb 10, 2011

Citations

10 Civ. 2395 (SHS) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 10, 2011)

Citing Cases

Arias v. Connolly

First, Judge Gleeson's conclusion that Petitioner did not warrant equitable tolling was plainly correct.…