From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Potchen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Mar 23, 2018
241 So. 3d 245 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 5D14–4336

03-23-2018

Robert Thomas POTCHEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Robert Thomas Potchen, Orlando, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and L. Charlene Matthews, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Robert Thomas Potchen, Orlando, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and L. Charlene Matthews, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Robert Potchen was convicted, after a jury trial, of several offenses including armed burglary of a structure with a firearm (count II) and aggravated assault with a firearm (count V). We affirm as to all issues raised on appeal except one. We conclude that the trial court erred in imposing consecutive mandatory minimum sentences on counts II and V. See, e.g. , Walton v. State , 208 So.3d 60, 64 (Fla. 2016) (reiterating that consecutive sentencing of mandatory minimum imprisonment terms for multiple firearm offenses is impermissible if offenses arose from same criminal episode and firearm was merely possessed but not discharged).

On remand, the trial court shall order the mandatory minimum sentences imposed on counts II and V to run concurrently.AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; and REMANDED.

EVANDER, BERGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Potchen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Mar 23, 2018
241 So. 3d 245 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Potchen v. State

Case Details

Full title:Robert Thomas POTCHEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Mar 23, 2018

Citations

241 So. 3d 245 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)