From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Posey v. Magill

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 7, 1988
530 So. 2d 985 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 87-851.

August 22, 1988. Rehearing Denied September 7, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Bay County, W.L. Bailey, J.

Bobby G. Posey, in pro. per.

Jeffrey P. Whitton, Panama City, for appellee.


Bobby G. Posey, the plaintiff below, appeals a final order dismissing his complaint against appellee and denying him leave to file an amended complaint. We reverse.

Pursuant to Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.190, a party may amend his pleading one time "as a matter of course before a responsive pleading is served." When Posey's initial complaint was dismissed he tendered an amended complaint and requested permission to amend, which was denied. The tendered amended complaint states causes of action for malicious prosecution, abuse of process and civil perjury. Unless it is clear from the face of a complaint that amendment would be futile, failure to grant a plaintiff at least one opportunity to amend his complaint constitutes an abuse of discretion. Ayers v. Home Owners Association of Killearn Estates, 360 So.2d 1326 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). Accordingly, the denial of leave to amend is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court with instructions that Posey be afforded an opportunity to amend his initial complaint as mandated by Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.190.

SHIVERS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Posey v. Magill

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 7, 1988
530 So. 2d 985 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Posey v. Magill

Case Details

Full title:BOBBY G. POSEY, APPELLANT, v. IRENE MAGILL, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Sep 7, 1988

Citations

530 So. 2d 985 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Grove Isle Ass'n v. Grove Isle Associates, LLLP

In light of this well-established law, the trial court's dismissal of the Condominium Association's first…

Boca Burger, Inc. v. Forum

Several courts have recognized that the first sentence of the rule grants plaintiffs an automatic right to…