From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Porter v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Mar 11, 1937
234 Ala. 11 (Ala. 1937)

Opinion

6 Div. 1.

March 11, 1937.



We entertain the view that the subjoined opinion to your inquiry by a member of your court correctly answers the inquiry, and we concur therein.

To the case of Barnewall v. Murrell, 108 Ala. 366, 18 So. 831, may be added, from this court, Northcot v. State, 43 Ala. 330, and from the Court of Appeals Vinson v. State, 10 Ala. App. 61, 64 So. 639, and Jackson v. State, 24 Ala. App. 601, 139 So. 576, which authorities, we think, lead inevitably to this conclusion.

As to whether reversible error, in the particular case, is presented in consideration of Supreme Court Rule 45, and the noted section 9509, Code, is not a question involved in your inquiry.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER, BOULDIN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Porter v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Mar 11, 1937
234 Ala. 11 (Ala. 1937)
Case details for

Porter v. State

Case Details

Full title:PORTER v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Mar 11, 1937

Citations

234 Ala. 11 (Ala. 1937)
174 So. 311

Citing Cases

Schoenvogel v. Venator Group Retail, Inc.

"It has been the recognized doctrine in this State that a legislative enactment takes precedence over a rule…

M.L.H. v. State

"`It has been the recognized doctrine in this State that a legislative enactment takes precedence over a rule…