From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Populus v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Sep 25, 1973
283 So. 2d 617 (Ala. Crim. App. 1973)

Summary

observing that since the State never joined issue on the petition and no hearing was held on the merits, the petition was meritorious on its face and required a hearing

Summary of this case from Ex Parte Boatwright

Opinion

1 Div. 431.

September 25, 1973.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Mobile County, Hubert P. Robertson, J.

No brief for appellant.

No brief for the State.


Petitioner appeals the denial of his petition for writ of error coram nobis.

Contained in the record before us is the sworn petition for writ of error coram nobis, motion to vacate the previous judgment of conviction, and a summary denial of each motion. For aught that appears from the record, the State never joined issue on the factual averments of the petition. Furthermore, the record indicates that petitioner was never afforded a hearing on the merits.

Since the petition was meritorious on its face, petitioner should have been afforded a hearing on the merits had issue been properly joined. See Aaron v. State, 283 Ala. 52, 214 So.2d 327.

The judgment denying the petition is hereby reversed and the cause is remanded for proceedings in conformity with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.

All the Judges concur.


Summaries of

Populus v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Sep 25, 1973
283 So. 2d 617 (Ala. Crim. App. 1973)

observing that since the State never joined issue on the petition and no hearing was held on the merits, the petition was meritorious on its face and required a hearing

Summary of this case from Ex Parte Boatwright
Case details for

Populus v. State

Case Details

Full title:Carl POPULUS v. STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Sep 25, 1973

Citations

283 So. 2d 617 (Ala. Crim. App. 1973)
51 Ala. App. 166

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

The petition is meritorious on its face and appellant should have been afforded a hearing on the merits.…

Pritchett v. State

Since the petition was facially sufficient, petitioner should have been afforded a hearing on the merits upon…