From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Plotts v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Feb 26, 2009
Civil No. 07-1604-TC (D. Or. Feb. 26, 2009)

Opinion

Civil No. 07-1604-TC.

February 26, 2009


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on February 13, 2009. The matter is now before me.See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982).See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation. The Commissioner's final decision is affirmed.


Summaries of

Plotts v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Feb 26, 2009
Civil No. 07-1604-TC (D. Or. Feb. 26, 2009)
Case details for

Plotts v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:GWEN PLOTTS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Feb 26, 2009

Citations

Civil No. 07-1604-TC (D. Or. Feb. 26, 2009)

Citing Cases

Kenneth R. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

n in part because the claimant "recently worked as a personal caregiver for two years, and has sought out…

John B. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

It was therefore reasonable for the ALJ to find that a return to full-time work with no indication that his…