From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Plotkowski v. Saul

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Feb 9, 2022
20-cv-12011 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 9, 2022)

Opinion

20-cv-12011

02-09-2022

Linda Plotkowski, Plaintiff, v. Andrew Saul, Comm'r of Soc. Sec., Defendant.


KIMBERLY G. ALTMAN U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION[#18], DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR

SUMMARYJUDGMENT[#12]ANDGRANTINGDEFENDANT'S

MOTIONFORSUMMARYJUDGMENT[#15]

GERSHWIN A. DRAIN U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

On February 23, 2021, Plaintiff Linda Plotkowski filed a motion for summary judgment in this social security disability benefits action. See ECF No. 12. Defendant Andrew Saul, the Social Security Commissioner, also submitted a motion for summary judgment on April 23, 2021. See ECF No. 15. Plaintiff filed her response to Defendant's motion two weeks later. See ECF No. 16.

Presently before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Kimberly G. Altman's Report and Recommendation concerning the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment. See ECF No. 18. Judge Altman recommends that this Court deny Plaintiff's motion, grant Defendant's motion, and affirm the Commissioner's decision. ECF No. 18, PageID.1510. Neither party filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the opportunity to file objections has passed. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(2).

When no objections are timely filed, a district court reviews a magistrate judge's report and recommendation for clear error. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72, advisory committee note (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”). The Court reviewed the Report and Recommendation and found no clear error.

Therefore, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Judge Altman's Report and Recommendation [#18], as this Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [#12] is DENIED.

Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [#15] is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Plotkowski v. Saul

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Feb 9, 2022
20-cv-12011 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Plotkowski v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:Linda Plotkowski, Plaintiff, v. Andrew Saul, Comm'r of Soc. Sec.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Feb 9, 2022

Citations

20-cv-12011 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 9, 2022)

Citing Cases

Todd J. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Chidsey v. Kijakazi, No. 1:20-CV-01858, 2022 WL 4599195, at *8-9 (N.D. Ohio Sept. 30, 2022) (citing cases);…

Lisa C. v. Kijakazi

ALJ Lovitt was not required to restate previous findings again in the RFC analysis. See Plotkowski v. Comm'r…