From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pittman v. ABB Inc.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Sep 10, 2018
No. 18-1097 (8th Cir. Sep. 10, 2018)

Opinion

No. 18-1097

09-10-2018

Eddie LaReece Pittman Plaintiff - Appellant v. ABB Inc. Defendant - Appellee


Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City [Unpublished] Before LOKEN, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Eddie Pittman appeals the district court's dismissal of his pro se Title VII action against his former employer, ABB Inc. Upon careful de novo review, see Plymouth Cty. v. Merscorp, Inc., 774 F.3d 1155, 1158-59 (8th Cir. 2014) (standard of review), this court agrees with the district court's conclusion that Pittman failed to state claims of race discrimination, hostile work environment, and retaliation under Title VII, see Young v. Builders Steel Co., 754 F.3d 573, 577 (8th Cir. 2014) (discussing requirements for race-discrimination claim); Jackman v. Fifth Judicial Dist. Dep't of Corr. Servs., 728 F.3d 800, 804 (8th Cir. 2013) (discussing requirements for retaliation claim); Singletary v. Mo. Dep't of Corr., 423 F.3d 886, 892-93 (8th Cir. 2005) (discussing requirements for hostile-work-environment claim).

The Honorable Willie J. Epps, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). --------

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.


Summaries of

Pittman v. ABB Inc.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Sep 10, 2018
No. 18-1097 (8th Cir. Sep. 10, 2018)
Case details for

Pittman v. ABB Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Eddie LaReece Pittman Plaintiff - Appellant v. ABB Inc. Defendant …

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Sep 10, 2018

Citations

No. 18-1097 (8th Cir. Sep. 10, 2018)