From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pimentel v. Orloff

United States District Court, N.D. California
Jul 7, 2008
No. C-08-0249 MMC (N.D. Cal. Jul. 7, 2008)

Opinion

No. C-08-0249 MMC.

July 7, 2008


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE; CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS


Before the Court is plaintiff's Motion for Continuance, filed July 1, 2008, by which plaintiff seeks an enlargement of time to file opposition to defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Defendants have opposed plaintiff's motion.

Although defendants point out certain deficiencies in plaintiff's showing, defendants have failed to demonstrate they would be prejudiced by such extension. See, e.g., Briones v. Riviera Hotel Casino, 116 F.3d 379, 381 (9th Cir. 1997) (holding "excusable neglect" encompasses negligent failure to meet filing deadline; listing prejudice to opposing party as one of factors to be considered).

Accordingly, plaintiff's motion is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file her opposition to defendants' Motion to Dismiss no later than July 18, 2008; defendants shall file any reply thereto no later than August 1, 2008. The hearing on the matter is continued to August 22, 2008 at 9:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pimentel v. Orloff

United States District Court, N.D. California
Jul 7, 2008
No. C-08-0249 MMC (N.D. Cal. Jul. 7, 2008)
Case details for

Pimentel v. Orloff

Case Details

Full title:DEBORAH J. PIMENTEL, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS J. ORLOFF, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Jul 7, 2008

Citations

No. C-08-0249 MMC (N.D. Cal. Jul. 7, 2008)