From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierre v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 18, 1982
414 So. 2d 30 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. 81-1196.

May 18, 1982.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Arthur I. Snyder, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Beth C. Weitzner, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Paul Mendelson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before NESBITT, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.


Upon the authority of State v. Hegstrom, 401 So.2d 1343 (Fla. 1981), we vacate the sentence imposed for possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense; we affirm the conviction.

Consistent with our certification in Marshall v. State, 413 So.2d 872 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) (on rehearing), we certify to the Supreme Court of Florida, as a matter of great public importance, the question of whether trial courts are empowered to impose separate punishments for the statutory offenses relating to the use of a firearm during the commission of a felony and the commission of that same felony by the use of a firearm.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Pierre v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 18, 1982
414 So. 2d 30 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Pierre v. State

Case Details

Full title:EMMANUEL PIERRE, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 18, 1982

Citations

414 So. 2d 30 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Torrence v. State

Since the simple assault conviction and the use of a firearm conviction involved the same crimes and the same…

Baker v. State

Our sister courts have held, without much discussion, that double jeopardy applies in this context. Moore v.…