From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phillips v. Warden

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Oct 4, 1990
581 A.2d 1056 (Conn. 1990)

Opinion

Decided October 4, 1990


The petitioner John M. Phillips' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 23 Conn. App. 63, is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Was the petitioner's constitutional right to the undivided loyalty of counsel violated where his attorney, Bernard L. Avcollie, still practicing law after his own conviction in a highly publicized case in the same courthouse, Was unable to pursue certain courses of action, such as probing individual voir dire to protect his client against juror bias, because Avcollie put his own interest in staying on the case ahead of his professional judgment that most members of the jury panel knew of his conviction and his `nagging feeling that [his] reputation was going to hurt this man [the petitioner]?'

"2. Was the trial court's violation of its constitutional duty to inquire into defense counsel's possible conflict of interest harmless beyond a reasonable doubt in light of the petitioner's failure to prove an actual conflict of interest by a preponderance of the evidence?"

Timothy H. Everett and Giovanna M. Tiberii, certified legal intern, in support of the petition.

James A. KiIlen, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Summaries of

Phillips v. Warden

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Oct 4, 1990
581 A.2d 1056 (Conn. 1990)
Case details for

Phillips v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:JOHN M. PHILLIPS v. WARDEN, STATE PRISON

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Oct 4, 1990

Citations

581 A.2d 1056 (Conn. 1990)
216 Conn. 822

Citing Cases

Phillips v. Warden

We granted certification to appeal limited to two issues: (1) whether the petitioner was denied his…