From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pettaway v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Apr 21, 2008
CIVIL ACTION 06-00880-WS-B (S.D. Ala. Apr. 21, 2008)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

finding that the ALJ erred in rejecting the opinions of a treating physician because insufficient detail was set forth by the ALJ for the reviewing court to be able to conduct any kind of meaningful analysis

Summary of this case from Gray v. Colvin
See 10 Summaries

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION 06-00880-WS-B.

April 21, 2008

ORDER

WILLIAM STEELE, District Judge

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated March 26, 2008, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

DONE and ORDERED.

Summaries of

Pettaway v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Apr 21, 2008
CIVIL ACTION 06-00880-WS-B (S.D. Ala. Apr. 21, 2008)

finding that the ALJ erred in rejecting the opinions of a treating physician because insufficient detail was set forth by the ALJ for the reviewing court to be able to conduct any kind of meaningful analysis

Summary of this case from Gray v. Colvin

finding that the ALJ erred in rejecting the opinions of a treating physician because insufficient detail was set forth by the ALJ for the reviewing court to be able to conduct any kind of meaningful analysis

Summary of this case from Huckabaa v. Colvin

finding that the ALJ erred in rejecting the opinions of a treating physician because insufficient detail was set forth by the ALJ for the reviewing court to be able to conduct any kind of meaningful analysis

Summary of this case from Billups v. Colvin

finding that the ALJ erred in rejecting the opinions of a treating physician because insufficient detail was set forth by the ALJ for the reviewing court to be able to conduct any kind of meaningful analysis

Summary of this case from Norris v. Astrue

finding that the ALJ erred in rejecting the opinions of a treating physician because insufficient detail was set forth by the ALJ for the reviewing court to be able to conduct any kind of meaningful analysis

Summary of this case from Gosha v. Astrue

finding that the ALJ erred in rejecting the opinions of a treating physician because insufficient detail was set forth by the ALJ for the reviewing court to be able to conduct any kind of meaningful analysis

Summary of this case from Williams v. Astrue

finding that the ALJ erred in rejecting the opinions of a treating physician because insufficient detail was set for by the ALJ for the reviewing court to be able to conduct any kind of meaningful analysis

Summary of this case from Mitchell v. Astrue

affirming the ALJ's finding that the claimant's impairment was not severe when difficulties with concentration, persistence, or pace were classified as "moderate" rather than "mild"

Summary of this case from O'Bier v. Astrue

affirming the ALJ's finding that the claimant's impairment was not severe when difficulties with concentration, persistence, or pace were classified as "moderate" rather than "mild"

Summary of this case from Hall v. Astrue

affirming the ALJ's finding was not severe when difficulties with concentration, persistence, or pace were classified as "moderate" rather than "mild"

Summary of this case from Mullin v. Astrue
Case details for

Pettaway v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DARIN R. PETTAWAY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: Apr 21, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION 06-00880-WS-B (S.D. Ala. Apr. 21, 2008)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Astrue

Washington v. Barnhart, 175 F. Supp. 2d 1340, 1346 (M.D. Ala. 2001) (finding that the ALJ properly considered…

O'Bier v. Astrue

Further, the ALJ gave Plaintiff the benefit of the doubt by assigning Plaintiff "mild" limitations in the…

10 Citing Cases