From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petrano v. Baylor

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Mar 12, 2020
291 So. 3d 663 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 1D18-1334

03-12-2020

David F. PETRANO, and Katherine Day-Petrano, Appellants, v. Darlene P. BAYLOR, Appellee.

David F. Petrano and Mary Katherine Day-Petrano, pro se, Hawthorne, Appellants. Ronald A. Hertel of Chiumento Dwyer Hertel Grant & Kistemaker, PL, Palm Coast, for Appellee.


David F. Petrano and Mary Katherine Day-Petrano, pro se, Hawthorne, Appellants.

Ronald A. Hertel of Chiumento Dwyer Hertel Grant & Kistemaker, PL, Palm Coast, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellants challenge the final judgment of foreclosure and the amended final judgment of foreclosure on grounds that the trial court lacked jurisdiction, indispensable party defendants were not joined, the mortgage was ineffective to encumber the real property at issue, and other factual matters not preserved for appellate review. "Without a transcript, and in the absence of fundamental error on its face, an appellate court will affirm a trial court's decision." Tramontana v. Bank of New York Mellon , 230 So. 3d 601, 602 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017). Appellants fail to establish any jurisdictional defect in the judgments on appeal. In addition, Appellants fail to show that the trial court committed any errors of fact or of law in the judgments based on the documents in the record. The orders on appeal are therefore AFFIRMED .

Roberts, Bilbrey, and Winokur, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Petrano v. Baylor

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Mar 12, 2020
291 So. 3d 663 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Petrano v. Baylor

Case Details

Full title:DAVID F. PETRANO, and KATHERINE DAY-PETRANO, Appellants, v. DARLENE P…

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Mar 12, 2020

Citations

291 So. 3d 663 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)