Summary
characterizing ORS 215.296 findings as factual findings subject to substantial evidence review by LUBA
Summary of this case from Stop the Dump Coalition v. Yamhill Cnty.Opinion
1993.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review Allowed and Denied
Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1993
316 Or. 529 (Or. 1993)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review Allowed and Denied
Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1993
316 Or. 529 (Or. 1993)
characterizing ORS 215.296 findings as factual findings subject to substantial evidence review by LUBA
Summary of this case from Stop the Dump Coalition v. Yamhill Cnty.setting forth circumstances under which a rational jury could infer that the defendant expressly or impliedly threatened the victim
Summary of this case from State v. Jimenezdescribing circumstances that presented some evidence of an implied threat
Summary of this case from State v. MagelCase details for
Petitions for Review Allowed and Denied
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1993
Citations
316 Or. 529 (Or. 1993)
Citing Cases
State v. Hall
" 34 Or App at 941-42. Second, in State v. Odoms, 117 Or. App. 1, 5, 844 P.2d 217 (1992), rev den 316 Or. 529…
Weidner v. ArmenakisThat volume contains no reference to a psychological diagnosis of "severe emotional disturbance." We do not…